Context
The universal window theorem says irregularity must occur. The digit presentation identifies exactly where, how densely, and with what scattered depth each translation jumps.
Hypotheses and scope
- The parameter c satisfies c>=1.
- For finite support, s is the final support coordinate, A the final digit, and r=v_2(A).
Proof or evidence
Zero has no jumps; infinite support jumps at every positive finite-code point; finite nonzero support produces an exact scattered subset with height s+1 and largest gap h_c^s(2^r). Their union is B_c^+, leaving a co-countable common continuity set.
Verification notes
The zero, finite-support, and infinite-support cases; density; arithmetic identification; gap formula; and shared-family regularity claims were separately reconciled and replayed with finite regression probes.
Limitations
- The equality B_c=Q_>=0 holds for positive integer c, not arbitrary real c.
- The equi-Baire-one statement is a shared-gauge family property and does not promote the decoder to standard Baire class 1.
Notes
If the final support is s and the final digit A has r=v_2(A), the discontinuity set has height s+1 and exact maximum complementary diameter h_c iterated s times at 2^r. For every positive integer c, B_c is the nonnegative rationals; this arithmetic identification is not asserted for arbitrary real c. Equi-Baire 1 refers only to the cited shared-LTZ-gauge family notion and does not make the decoder standard pointwise-limit Baire class 1 into N^N.