Context
The elementary valuation argument first gives f at most four. A complete periodic residue analysis excludes f=3 and f=4.
Proof or evidence
The opposite-character law follows modulo eight. Six complete periodic rows survive the first sieve for f=3,4; each is contradicted modulo 9, 27, 64, 81, or 271.
Verification notes
An independent implementation reconstructs the residue rows and final contradictions; bounded searches are retained only as controls.
Limitations
- The theorem excludes two valuation branches but does not prove the desired cost inequality for all proper forks.
- Likely novelty has not been assessed externally.