Research program

Selfridge integer complexity

This program attacks Selfridge's question∥2n∥=2n\lVert2^n\rVert=2n by preserving the actual cost of factored formulas and turning restricted expression shapes into exponential Diophantine equations. Its present results close several infinite branches of a normalized three-addition family. The unrestricted problem remains open.

Driving question

Where could a saving over repeated twos hide?

The obvious expression for 2n2^nuses 2n2n ones. Any saving must come from addition creating a useful nonsmooth factor more cheaply than multiplication by twos would. The present attack freezes a substantial three-addition architecture,

M[A(B+C)(D+E)+F], M\bigl[A(B+C)(D+E)+F\bigr],

and keeps every displayed atom and unit charge. This makes the cost comparison exact while exposing congruences, valuations, multiplicative orders, primitive divisors, and p-adic lifting.

Completed branch structure

What the attack has actually established

  1. Primitive proper forks have opposite mod-eight characters and final 2-adic exponent at most two.
  2. The entire y=0 cyclotomic ladder has no nonsmooth rung beyond the known harmless controls.
  3. The complete odd-exponent branch has one genuine solution,7⋅73+1=297\cdot73+1=2^9, but its factored presentations cost more than2N2N.
  4. At the first even layer, most canonical shapes are excluded. The apparent 3-adic lift of15⋅17+1=2815\cdot17+1=2^8 is now completely contradicted by its first Hensel digit and a nine-residue table modulo 19441.
  5. The complete first-layer type-II2 family is empty. A mod-seven divisibility gate, a mod-73 boundary certificate, and exact quotients modulo 19441, 6481, and 13 eliminate every large-xx class, including both imbalances and the diagonal.
  6. The last type-II1 family falls to a modulus-7 gate followed by a disjoint modulus-13 residue pair. Consequently the fulla=1a=1 layer of the active canonical branch is closed.
  7. The first serious a=2a=2type-I2 family is also empty. A 3-adic lift removes the formal rational boundary, after which modulo 271 gives a complete residue separation.
  8. The final odd-exponent type-II2 family falls to coupled quotients modulo 73 and 577. Consequently the fulla=2a=2 layer is closed.
  9. At a=3a=3, the exact entry table and finite gate quotients first isolate the remote tail; a modulus-262657 quotient followed by moduli 7 and 13 closes every remaining row.
  10. A paired-prime obstruction modulo 73 and 262657 excludes every exterior layer a≥4a\ge4 for both canonical positive-factor types. Together with the lower layers, this completes the entireg=0g=0 positive-type-I branch.
  11. For the complementary factor2x+3y2^x+3^y, a complete 524,288-state quotient closes thea=3a=3 layer. A coupled-order quotient then proves x≤10x\le10for every remaining low-layer solution.
  12. The 21 complementary low-layer rows are now classified. The full valuation N=v2(F(v,y))N=v_2(F(v,y))fixes eleven rows and turns each other row into a one-dimensional Hensel graph. At precision 2222^{22}, all 20,480 graph states fail modulo 65,537.
  13. Exactly ten positive-type-II controls remain, representing four factorizations at N=8,10,12N=8,10,12. Every one costs at least 2N+42N+4. The earlier five-row height barrier remains correct but is superseded by this complete nonboundary exclusion.
  14. In the complementary a=0<ga=0<gorientation, quadratic reciprocity reduces twelve canonical residue pairings to six. It also excludes the completef=2f=2 subbranch where both inner sums contribute one factor of two.
  15. In the three surviving complementaryf=1f=1 rows, canonical parity leaves six possible tied-minimum cancellations. Their complete residue periods modulo 7 and 73 are disjoint, so every solution satisfiesmin⁡(b,y,g)=1+v3(K+1−h)\min(b,y,g)=1+v_3(K+1-h).
  16. In the alternative complementaryf=2f=2 split, the valuation-two odd part has four residue types and leaves eight gate placements. Ten possible tied-minimum cancellations are eliminated by complete periods modulo 7, 73, 487, and 2593. Every solution therefore satisfiesmin⁡(b,y,g)=1+v3(K+2−h)\min(b,y,g)=1+v_3(K+2-h).
  17. Combining the two valuation laws atm=1,2m=1,2 produces 32 exact minimum strata. Nine are empty; the others reduce to 40 periodic lift graphs with common period20,652,025,68020{,}652{,}025{,}680. Their centered roots are seventeen harmless proper presentations and nine improper rational identities, so every noncontrol proper solution has output exponent at least the common period.
  18. The next ternary digit modulo 729 eliminates all eleven boundary-rooted graphs and freezes 26 control-rooted graphs. The last three graphs reduce to two exponential equations; Matveev's explicit logarithmic bound and exact modular descent leave only the seventeen centered controls. Thus the completem=1,2m=1,2 layers contain no cost-saving presentation.
  19. Expanding every complementary equation gives five positive S-units in a multiplicative group of rank at most six. Evertse–Schlickewei–Schmidt therefore proves uniform finiteness of all eight fixed factor shapes, with the crude bound8exp⁡(7⋅3015)8\exp(7\cdot30^{15}). The theorem counts solutions but does not bound their heights.
  20. In the complementary f=0f=0branch, the reciprocity table has forty canonical placements and twenty possible tied-minimum cancellations. Exactly two have all three ternary exponents tied. Complete mod-7/mod-73 tables eliminate one; a 2-adic gate and a factorization of 65 show that the other contains only(2+3)(1+8⋅3)+3=27(2+3)(1+8\cdot3)+3=2^7, costing four extra ones.
  21. The eighteen pair-minimum cancellation strata reduce under a complete four-prime quotient to 23 states. Modulo 27 leaves one family, and an elementary factorization of 175 proves its only solution is(4+3)(1+8⋅3)+34=28(4+3)(1+8\cdot3)+3^4=2^8, costing thirteen extra ones. Thus all twenty exceptional cancellations are classified, and every otherf=0f=0 solution satisfiesmin⁡(v,y,g)=1+v3(K−r−u)\min(v,y,g)=1+v_3(K-r-u).

Read the exact theorems, proofs, boundaries, and evidence →

Structural stopping boundary

The residue-table phase is complete; a different idea is now required

After removing the final common power of two, the complementary orientation is

RS+3g=2K. RS+3^g=2^K.

The uniform S-unit theorem proves finiteness but gives no effective height cutoff. The new theorem removes every exceptional first-digit cancellation inf=0f=0, yet a direct lift of the forty general placements to modulo 729 still leaves 1,953 patterns after the valuation law is imposed. The unresolved work is therefore not a short finite tail. Reopening this program should require an effective reduction of the product-structured six-term S-unit equation, a uniform dominance or freezing theorem, or a normal-form theorem connecting arbitrary formulas to this restricted grammar.

Research discipline

Restricted theorems remain restricted

The program uses complete residue periods rather than large finite searches whenever it claims an infinite exclusion. Bounded computations serve as transcription checks and positive controls. Imported theorems are named at the exact boundaries where they are used. A result enters the ordinary research site when it is mathematically useful; only a resolution or genuinely substantial advance would warrant a separate publication.