Sylvester line quadrics: an exact rank-gap characterization and its syzygetic boundary

Contents

Status

This note records one exact reformulation of the Sylvester condition, an explicit counterexample to the resulting geometric shortcut, and a sharper reduction of the remaining attack. It neither proves nor refutes Conjecture 4.1 of Fouli, Grate, Kara, LaClair, McCullough, Nguyen, Sobieska, and Udanshive.

The source conjecture says that if the graded Möbius algebra of a simple matroid is quadratic, then its defining ideal is linearly presented exactly when the matroid is Sylvester. The source proves the implication from linear presentation to Sylvester. The reverse implication remains open.

1. The quadratic line ideal

Let MM be a simple matroid on EE, let VV have basis (xe)e∈E(x_e)_{e\in E}, and write S=Sym⁡(V)S=\operatorname{Sym}(V). For every rank-two flat LL, all squarefree pair monomials xexfx_ex_f with e,f∈Le,f\in L have the same image in the graded Möbius algebra. Consequently its quadratic relation space is

RM=(IM)2=⟨xe2:e∈E⟩+⟨xexf−xgxh:cl⁡(e,f)=cl⁡(g,h)⟩. R_M=(I_M)_2 =\left\langle x_e^2:e\in E\right\rangle +\left\langle x_ex_f-x_gx_h:\operatorname{cl}(e,f)=\operatorname{cl}(g,h) \right\rangle .

Call JM=(RM)J_M=(R_M) the quadratic line ideal. It depends only on the rank-two flats of MM. If the graded Möbius algebra is quadratic, then

IM=JM. I_M=J_M.

Thus the open reverse implication is reduced exactly to the first syzygies of this line ideal under the additional assumption that it already presents the full graded Möbius algebra.

2. The inverse quadratic system detects Sylvester exactly

Pair monomials belonging to different rank-two flats have disjoint supports. Under the coefficient pairing on Sym⁡2(V)\operatorname{Sym}^2(V), the orthogonal space of RMR_M is therefore

WM=RM⊥=span⁡{QL:L∈L2(M)},QL=∑{e,f}⊂Lzezf. W_M=R_M^\perp =\operatorname{span}\{Q_L:L\in L_2(M)\}, \qquad Q_L=\sum_{\{e,f\}\subset L}z_ez_f.

Here the variables zez_e are dual to the xex_e. The following statement is valid over every characteristic-zero field, after extending scalars when testing matrix rank.

Proposition 2.1

For a simple matroid MM, the following are equivalent:

  1. MM is Sylvester: every pair of elements belongs to a 3-circuit;
  2. every nonzero quadric in WMW_M has rank at least three;
  3. P(WM)\mathbb P(W_M) is disjoint from the rank-at-most-two symmetric determinantal locus.

Proof

If MM is not Sylvester, some pair {e,f}\{e,f\} has a two-point closure LL. Then QL=zezfQ_L=z_ez_f has rank two.

Conversely, assume MM is Sylvester and take 0≠Q=∑LaLQL0\ne Q=\sum_L a_LQ_L. Choose a line LL with aL≠0a_L\ne0. It contains three distinct points e,f,ge,f,g. Because every pair belongs to a unique rank-two flat, the principal matrix of QQ on these three coordinates is

aL(011101110). a_L\begin{pmatrix} 0&1&1\\ 1&0&1\\ 1&1&0 \end{pmatrix}.

Its determinant is 2aL3≠02a_L^3\ne0. Hence rank⁡(Q)≥3\operatorname{rank}(Q)\ge3. □\square

This packages the Sylvester axiom as a canonical rank gap. The next section shows that the rank gap, by itself, does not control the first syzygies.

3. A four-variable countermodel to the secant shortcut

Order the six off-diagonal monomials as

12,13,14,23,24,34. 12,13,14,23,24,34.

Let W⊂Sym⁡2(Q4)∗W\subset\operatorname{Sym}^2(\mathbb Q^4)^* be the three-dimensional space whose coefficient map is

C=(−1−1−11−1−101−100−1−101011). C= \begin{pmatrix} -1&-1&-1\\ 1&-1&-1\\ 0&1&-1\\ 0&0&-1\\ -1&0&1\\ 0&1&1 \end{pmatrix}.

Thus a parameter vector u∈Q3u\in\mathbb Q^3 gives the off-diagonal coefficients CuCu of a quadric in WW, and every quadric in WW has zero diagonal.

Proposition 3.1

P(W)\mathbb P(W) contains no quadric of rank at most two.

Proof

Over an algebraic closure of a characteristic-zero field, a nonzero zero-diagonal symmetric matrix of rank two has its support across a bipartition. Indeed it can be written uvt+vutuv^t+vu^t; the diagonal equations uivi=0u_iv_i=0 partition the nonzero coordinates according to which factor vanishes. Rank one is impossible unless the matrix is zero.

It is therefore enough to check the seven bipartitions of four coordinates, up to exchanging their sides. For the four cuts of type 1+31+3, restriction to the three within-side edges gives 3×33\times3 determinants

1,2,−3,−2. 1,\quad 2,\quad -3,\quad -2.

Thus no nonzero parameter vector can be supported on such a cut. For the three cuts of type 2+22+2, the two within-side equations have respective kernel vectors

(0,1,−1),(−1,0,−1),(−1,0,0). (0,1,-1),\qquad(-1,0,-1),\qquad(-1,0,0).

At those vectors, the determinants of the remaining 2×22\times2 cross blocks are

−2,−3,1. -2,\quad -3,\quad 1.

The resulting matrices have rank four, not two. This exhausts the possible bipartitions. □\square

Now set I=(W⊥)⊂S=Q[x1,x2,x3,x4]I=(W^\perp)\subset S=\mathbb Q[x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4]. The ideal is generated by the four squares and the three quadrics

r1=−x1x2−x1x3−2x1x4+4x2x3,r2=−x1x2+3x1x3+2x1x4+4x2x4,r3=x1x2+x1x3+2x3x4. \begin{aligned} r_1&=-x_1x_2-x_1x_3-2x_1x_4+4x_2x_3,\\ r_2&=-x_1x_2+3x_1x_3+2x_1x_4+4x_2x_4,\\ r_3&= x_1x_2+x_1x_3+2x_3x_4. \end{aligned}

The quotient A=S/IA=S/I is quadratic and Artinian. Exact row reduction gives

HF⁡A=(1,4,3), \operatorname{HF}_A=(1,4,3),

because the products xirjx_ir_j span all four squarefree cubic monomials. In internal degree four, therefore,

K2,4(A)=A2⊗⋀2Q4 K_{2,4}(A)=A_2\otimes\bigwedge^2\mathbb Q^4

is an 18-dimensional cycle space. The preceding Koszul differential

d3:A1⊗⋀3Q4⟶A2⊗⋀2Q4 d_3:A_1\otimes\bigwedge^3\mathbb Q^4 \longrightarrow A_2\otimes\bigwedge^2\mathbb Q^4

has exact rank 15. Hence

β2,4S(A)=18−15=3. \boxed{\beta^S_{2,4}(A)=18-15=3.}

So II is not linearly presented even though its inverse quadratic system avoids the full rank-at-most-two locus. Secant avoidance is not a sufficient syzygetic criterion, even for a quadratic Artinian ideal containing all variable squares.

4. Why this does not refute the matroid conjecture

The countermodel is not a graded Möbius algebra. A matroid inverse system has the stronger form

WM=⨁L∈L2(M)kQL, W_M=\bigoplus_{L\in L_2(M)}\mathbb k Q_L,

where the edge supports of the QLQ_L partition all unordered pairs. The countermodel lacks this disjoint line-support structure. Proposition 3.1 therefore stops the generic Veronese/secant route but leaves the matroid-specific incidence route open.

There is a useful exact positive control. The rank-three truncation T(PG(3,2))T(PG(3,2)) and the full projective geometry PG(3,2)PG(3,2) have the same points and rank-two flats, hence the same quadratic line ideal. The truncation has extra essential cubic relations and the earlier audit found dim⁡H2,4=209\dim H_{2,4}=209. For the full projective geometry, the line ideal is the entire defining ideal. Exact rational Koszul ranks give

β2,4=β2,5=β2,6=0. \beta_{2,4}=\beta_{2,5}=\beta_{2,6}=0.

Thus the full quadratic coherence removes the truncation’s entire nonlinear second-homology block. This is a control, not a proof by examples.

5. Next decisive question

The surviving structural target is now sharper:

Is the quadratic line ideal of every finite linear space whose lines all have at least three points linearly presented? If not, what additional incidence identity is forced when that line ideal is the defining ideal of a quadratic graded Möbius algebra?

A proof should construct the presentation from the line-partition tensor, not from chosen third points or a matroid census. A failure should be an intrinsic obstruction in that tensor. The generic secant geometry supplies no further leverage.

6. Reproducibility and credit

The dependency-free script verify-secant-gap-boundary.py checks every cut determinant, the orthogonal relation space, the cubic span, the exact Koszul rank, and the full PG(3,2)PG(3,2) positive control over Q\mathbb Q.

The conjecture, its proved direction, and the T(PG(3,2))T(PG(3,2)) source example are due to Fouli, Grate, Kara, LaClair, McCullough, Nguyen, Sobieska, and Udanshive (arXiv:2609.03827v1, 3 September 2026). The presentation of graded Möbius algebras and the quadraticity framework used here are due to LaClair, Mastroeni, McCullough, and Peeva (arXiv:2412.18499v1). The rank-gap reformulation, countermodel, and exact audits in this note have not received external review.

References

  • L. Fouli, S. Grate, S. Kara, A. LaClair, J. McCullough, V. Nguyen, A. Sobieska, and P. Udanshive, Graded Betti numbers of graded Möbius algebras of uniform matroids, arXiv:2609.03827v1 (2026), https://arxiv.org/html/2609.03827v1.
  • A. LaClair, M. Mastroeni, J. McCullough, and I. Peeva, Koszul graded Möbius algebras and strongly chordal graphs, arXiv:2412.18499v1 (2024), https://arxiv.org/html/2412.18499v1.