FPRD LabShare an approach

← Claims

Theorem, construction, or exact resource formula

MMR-024

Claim MMR-024

Exact statement

For the context w=b+rw=b+r, z=p+wz=p+w, transparent composition gives S(E[GR])=2S(E[G_R])=2 and S(E[GP])=3S(E[G_P])=3.

StatusProved in the FPRD research record
External reviewNo documented external or specialist review of the FPRD synthesis is recorded.

Context

This result belongs to the reconstruction from algebraic matrix-multiplication certificates to explicit arithmetic dependency DAGs and their resource receipts.

Hypotheses and scope

  • All resource conclusions are restricted to the arithmetic, storage, fan-out, coefficient, and precision models named in the source record.

Proof or evidence

Theorem R3.1: explicit upper schedules and a complete timing dichotomy for the lower bound.

Mathematical overview and evidence boundary →

Verification notes

The definitions, analytic proof chain, seam hypotheses, completion obligation, and likely failure points were reconstructed from the archived proofs on 2026-09-01. Four retained exact checkers reproduced the separator, product-state recurrence, bisimulation quotient, and stutter-trace witness with their recorded hashes. The current-label/external-pending distinction and the dead-gate boundary were checked explicitly.

Limitations

  • The record does not improve the known matrix-multiplication exponent and does not imply that omega equals two.
  • Construction bounds are not optimality, communication, I/O, or hardware claims unless the exact statement says so.

Open work

Resolve the trimmed-DAG strictness question and test whether a smaller exact contextual quotient replaces the completed trace language.