Theorem · finite hidden-choice closure with explicit transport bound

FPRD-T167

Finite causal selector covers preserve stationary transport

Exact statement

Let A have transport tuple (d,k,g,q), and let m synchronous finite-state selectors T_i with s_i states satisfy pi(A)=union_i T_i^{-1}(A). Then pi(A) has transport tuple (m*d,k,g^m,q^m product_i s_i). Thus every fixed finite online cover of the accepting hidden histories preserves bounded stationary transport.

StatusSelf-contained composition proof with exhaustive finite product audit
External reviewThe proof composes two local FPRD product constructions. No external or specialist review of the selector-cover formulation is recorded.

Context

T166 shows that one deterministic online choice is harmless. T167 identifies the maximal immediate extension: every fixed finite menu of such choices remains harmless after a Boolean product construction.

Hypotheses and scope

  • Each selector is total, deterministic, synchronous, and chooses a tagged lift of its observed input.
  • The finite family covers exactly the projected accepting language through the displayed union of inverse images.
  • A has one finite scaffolding presentation with tuple (d,k,g,q).

Proof or evidence

T166 compiles selector i with tuple (d,k,g,s_i q). T157 packs all m component graphs and accepts their union, yielding the exact displayed resource ceiling.

Verification notes

The checker compares 2,666,496 packed and separate runs over 86,016 selector families, including widths one through three, all two-state binary local machines, every accepting set, and all binary inputs through length four.

Limitations

  • The resource tuple is a sufficient product bound and need not be Pareto-optimal.
  • The theorem does not cover a selector family whose size grows with the input.
  • Finite selector covers are sufficient, not necessary, for a projected language to have bounded transport.
  • The construction uses standard finite products; no literature-priority claim is made.

Open work

Replace the finite selector count by a horizon-dependent selection profile and compare its growth with scaffold access capacity.