Context
The theorem converts the remaining analytic question into an exact action-realization problem, then removes two natural but insufficient representation doctrines.
Hypotheses and scope
- The action equivalence selects a regular elementary abelian 2-subgroup; it does not assume all locally BV permutations are closed under composition.
- The binary obstruction preserves ordinary binary labels away from eventually constant names.
Proof or evidence
Evaluation at zero transports a regular action to the group law, and the displacement bound gives metric domination. T122 rules out locally finite interval exchanges. In the binary architecture, each adjacent bit change contributes more than 1/2 to finite-prefix variation, so infinitely alternating translators have infinite variation.
Verification notes
The action transport, displacement equivalence, locally finite-IET contradiction, finite-prefix XOR variation formula, and endpoint repair boundary were independently re-derived; the finite formula has exact regression support.
Limitations
- Infinite support alone is not the binary obstruction; infinitely many adjacent bit changes are required.
- Dense discontinuities can still have summable jumps and bounded variation.
- The general regular locally-BV action is neither constructed nor refuted.
Notes
The binary obstruction applies only to bijections that preserve ordinary binary labels away from eventually constant names and uses infinitely many adjacent changes, not infinite support alone. Dense discontinuities are compatible with bounded variation, so the universal initial-density theorem does not refute the general regular action. The all-one endpoint calibration supplies no metric law or simultaneous BV family; a different ordering or non-coordinate action is outside the binary theorem. The two remaining stronger questions are unconditional whole-ray density and existence of the general locally BV regular action. Głąb--Kaufmann-- Pellegrini provide dense-jump BV calibration only. No novelty claim is made.