Context
This is the decisive obstruction to the dormant marginal-capacity route. It uses actual parity prefixes and exact guards rather than synthetic relaxed charts.
Definitions
- At the critical layer , choose the first depth where maximal-completion capacity is at most one, then inspect depth .
Hypotheses and scope
- Fixed positive C.
- Critical contracting layer and exact fixed-weight feasibility.
- The imported critical-layer estimate, whose logarithmic-form dependency has not been independently re-audited here.
Proof or evidence
Every sufficiently small exact guard remains a live capacity-one prefix. After excluding the subexponentially many prefixes with infeasible weight, the supplement counts survivors at the later depth. Selecting precisely their ancestors at depth gives zero attrition across the block.
Verification notes
This run checked the quantifier over fixed C, the distinction between capacity survival and paradoxical extension, and the exact exponent expression. The external critical-layer estimate remains a named dependency, so the entry stops at L4.
Limitations
- The surviving prefixes need not extend to paradoxical full words.
- The theorem refutes universal capacity-only contraction, not every possible joint guard–disorder contraction.
- No novelty or external-review claim is made.