Context
The most tempting reduction asks whether the output's derivative algebra is finitely generated. The counterexample shows that auxiliary commutative observables may finitely present an infinitely generated visible residual algebra.
Definitions
- Use controls with identical - and -transitions and , and output values .
- The recognised controls are and .
Hypotheses and scope
- The alphabet is nonempty and every letter induces the same transition; the displayed source-facing presentation uses two letters.
Proof or evidence
The recurrences give and , so both controls are commutative. Algebraic independence identifies with . The derivatives correspond to , whose degree-one component is , an infinite-dimensional space; a finitely generated graded algebra cannot have that degree-one component.
Verification notes
The FPRD proof audit rechecked the factorial recurrence, the algebraic-independence limit argument, and the homogeneous-component grading obstruction. An independent checker confirmed 507 unary and binary derivative identities and the rising-factorial triangular basis through degree twelve.
Limitations
- The counterexample refutes only necessity of finite generation of D(f).
- It does not refute existence of some other finite commutative over-algebra; here Q[f,g] is such an over-algebra.