Context
The family generalizes the four-variable example and supplies the lower bound used in the later completeness-radius theorem.
Definitions
- Let , with empty positive prefix at .
- Set , , , and .
Hypotheses and scope
- ; all displayed clauses have exactly distinct literals.
- Signatures compare closure and conflict status on every consistent seed through the stated size.
Proof or evidence
Resolving the two parents on gives the addition, hence semantic equivalence. CRD-SAT-10a gives agreement through depth . The seed has size : the parents reduce to and stall, while the resolvent propagates . Negating the resolvent makes the parents propagate opposite values of , establishing the RUP witness.
Verification notes
The all-width proof, the explicit first separating seed, and the RUP claim were reconstructed from the preserved checkpoint. Widths three through twelve are finite corroboration only.
Limitations
- The growing interaction depth is carried by growing clause width.
- The theorem does not give unbounded depth inside strict 3CNF.